Since April this year, Wenzhou has implemented official vehicle reforms. The number of auction buses was 1400, which accounted for about 80% of the total; about 300 law enforcement duty buses were left. Subsidy for cars after the reform of the car is divided into seven grades according to job level from the actual status of the county to the number of clerk and clerk. The actual salary per person in Zheng County is 3,100 yuan, equivalent to three times the minimum wage in the urban area of ​​Wenzhou. Officials in Wenzhou’s official ranks are making up for more than 800 yuan for official officials and 500 yuan for deputy department officials.

Due to the highest standards for car repairs, the Wenzhou car reform known as “the reform of the local government official car with the greatest efforts” has been greatly reduced. Take the Wenzhou Municipal Development and Reform Commission as an example. Before the car reform, in 2011, the company and its subordinate units spent about 1.33 million yuan on the bus; after the car reform, it required the annual amount of 1.62 million yuan to be paid, which was more than the annual expenditure before the car reform. 300,000 yuan. One of the original intentions of the car reform in Wenzhou was to save administrative expenses. Nowadays, there are both the suspicions of rationalizing the use of “whitewashed” buses for private use and the irrelevance of the principle of determining the standard of car repairs.

At the public level, the principle for determining the standards for car repairs in Wenzhou is too simple, that is, it is divided into job hierarchies—there are many contradictions and problems. For example, the official exchange between the clerk and the clerk in the city is theoretically more than that of the officer at the level of the clerk. The car replenishment costs from RMB 3,100 to RMB 300. Is it consistent with the needs of the work? How are the highest and lowest standards for accounting?

The lessons learned from past bus reforms all over the country show that without a subsidy principle that can withstand scrutiny and public argumentation, the car reform tends to change shape. In 2008, the vehicle reform in Gongchangling District, Liaoyang City, Liaoning Province, the Secretary of the District Party Committee and the district chief up to 80,000 yuan a year. At the same time, according to the public opinion analysis, 80,000 cars per year can be used to drive highway mileage “around the earth for two weeks.” This is obviously something that officials cannot do.

The general direction of the bus reform is unavoidable. From the reform efforts of some localities in recent years, it has become a model favored by reform promoters to auction buses and implement car repairs. Among these, the determination of the standards for car repair is crucial, and it needs to be publicly released and demonstrated so as to agglomerate reform consensus. Otherwise, the car reform has a direction, and the standards for car supplementation have no open, reasonable, and scientific principles, leaving doubts about the “redemption” or “welfare” reform.